First Putnam problem
I’ve made a deal with another guy hear at UH to help me study for the Putnam competition: we’ll be working on the A problems from the 85-90 competitions. Luckily, I bought a book with all the problems and solutions from 85-2000 this summer, so I’m set. Here’s the first one I’m working on:
A1 (1985). Determine, with proof, the number of ordered triples
of sets which have the property that
, and
where
denotes the empty set. Express the answer in the form
, where
,
,
, and
are nonnegative integers.
I’ll post my solution when I get one. Feel free to let me know yours
First Attempt: Let
and
, then what we’re looking for is
. That is,
. Let
, then
Substituting back,
Doesn’t seem quite right, some how, but I’m going to continue on, and see if I can factor it when I’m done.
Hmmm, thanks to Ronald’s comment, it seems that I’ve been doing the problem all wrong— the intersection of all three sets is empty— I was working as though the sets were mutually independent.
Possibly relevant posts:
- Prime factorizations of Binomial coefficients (1/13/2005)
- an ‘official’ Putnam sample problem (1/21/2005)
- Not a frame, but Bessel (5/26/2006)
of sets which have the property that
, and
denotes the empty set. Express the answer in the form
, where
,
,
, and
are nonnegative integers.
Each number between 1 and 10 must be in 1 set but cannot be in 3 sets. So can be in 1 set or 2 sets.
Consider any number.
There are 3 ways it can be in 1 set
and 3 ways it can be in 2 sets.
i.e. 6 possibilities in total.
Therefore, my answer is 6^10 =
2^10 * 3^10 * 5^0 * 7^0
If that’s right, I’ll be surprised and impressed with myself (it took me about 1 minute to come up with that).
Comment by Ronald — 1/19/2005 @ 12:44 pm
6^10 is what I got also. If you look at the different possibilities, you’ll see six for each element: A1 only, A2 only, A3 only, not A1, not A2, or not A3., giving 6^10.
Comment by Thomson — 1/21/2005 @ 3:43 am
Congratulations Thomson and Ronald, that’s the right answer. Sadly, that wasn’t clear to me until I read both your solutions, and the official one.
Comment by Alex — 1/21/2005 @ 3:22 pm