More on non-integral numbers of compositions
I did some thinking about the problem of taking a non-Integral number of compositions that I mentioned earlier.
What I’ve found is that it is pretty easy to define a rational number of compositions of a function, but that’s about it— there isn’t a reasonable definition that allows you to ‘add’ the number of compositions of functions because
in general.
There is a problem with existence and uniqueness, but I think the specific context given (
is an increasing function from
onto
) takes care of those problems— if we stipulate that if
is a rational number of compositions of
then
is increasing and maps from
onto
.
Unfortunately, all this speculation doesn’t help with something as ’simple’ as finding
.
Here’s what I have, Moore’s style:
- Defn. A function
is said to be a
-th root of the function
only in case
and the initial and final sets of
are the initial and final sets of
. - Prop. If
is increasing and maps from
onto
, there is only one
-root of
, denoted
, and
is increasing. - Prop.
. Denote this function by
. - Prop Let
be a sequence of rational numbers. If for every number
there is an integer
such that
for all
, then for every number
, there is an integer
such that
for all
.
I’m working on proving the two hardest of the above propositions.
Possibly relevant posts:
- Differentiable Flows (3/26/2005)
exists if
continuous and
B.V. (3/17/2005)- Non-integral number of compositions (3/11/2005)