Distribution function
January 14th, 2006 ~ Posted in: MathematicsLet
, and define the distribution function of
,
.
It has the following properties:
-a.e. implies that
for all
-
-
Here’s a neat result from Grafakos’ ‘Classical and Modern Fourier Analysis’: if
is increasing and
, then
Actually, I think you also need to state
. As a special case,
.
The proof consists of writing
as an integral in terms of
, extending the limits of integration of that integral to
by inserting an appropriate characteristic function
, using Fubini’s theorem– then the trickiest part is recognizing that the original characteristic function is exactly the same as the one needed to get
as your interior integral. I’m too lazy to write it out, but it’s a good exercise: it took me embarassingly long to figure out how Grafakos applied the Fubini theorem (namely, the equivalence of the characteristic functions).
The interesting thing about the distribution function is that it is not unique to the function (as a trivial example, under Lebesgue measure,
is the same for all translates of
), yet it determines the value of these particular functionals at
.
As an example, let
You can use the above result to show
. A non-trivial result!

One Response to “Distribution function”
March 28th, 2007 at 7:39 pm
[…] Oh, and I did figure out how to prove that heart stopper: use Fubini. I actually have seen this before, in a different context, when I was taking Papadakis’ fourier analysis course. See what I mean about forgetting stuff? […]
This entry was posted on Saturday, January 14th, 2006 at 12:14 pm and is filed under Mathematics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply