http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2006/08/the-riemann-rearrangement-theorem-and-an-interesting-corollary/ somewhere near the beginning. Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:18:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2006/08/the-riemann-rearrangement-theorem-and-an-interesting-corollary/#comment-224374 Anonymous Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:53:10 +0000 http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2006/08/the-riemann-rearrangement-theorem-and-an-interesting-corollary#comment-224374 The rearrangement theorem has important applications in the field of white collar crime and fraud: you can misrepresent your company simply by counting your faster than your liabilities (if you want to fool the stockholders) or vice versa (if you want to fool the IRS). The rearrangement theorem has important applications in the field of white collar crime and fraud: you can misrepresent your company simply by counting your faster than your liabilities (if you want to fool the stockholders) or vice versa (if you want to fool the IRS).

]]> http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2006/08/the-riemann-rearrangement-theorem-and-an-interesting-corollary/#comment-83448 Anonymous Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:41:07 +0000 http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2006/08/the-riemann-rearrangement-theorem-and-an-interesting-corollary#comment-83448 both of what you guys say is very interesting, but i still think that diagonalization is very elegan both of what you guys say is very interesting, but i still think that diagonalization is very elegan

]]> http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2006/08/the-riemann-rearrangement-theorem-and-an-interesting-corollary/#comment-53020 k Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:11:45 +0000 http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2006/08/the-riemann-rearrangement-theorem-and-an-interesting-corollary#comment-53020 >Beats diagonalization arguments any day. if you want to avoid diagonalization, you should also prove that the reals are uncountable independently, i guess one can do this by saying that it contains a perfect subset and perfect sets can be proved to be uncountable without using iagonalization. >Beats diagonalization arguments any day.
if you want to avoid diagonalization, you should also prove that the reals are uncountable independently, i guess one can do this by saying that
it contains a perfect subset and perfect sets can be
proved to be uncountable without using iagonalization.

]]>