Eikonal equation
The eikonal equation is a non-linear PDE related to the least action principle and the Hamilton-Jacobi equations of mechanics:

One application of the equation is describing the propagation of a wavefront through a medium where the local speed is a function of location
. In this case, the level sets of
correspond to the wavefronts at different times; that is, the set
is the wavefront at time
. The derivation of this equation is straightforward: let
represent the differential path of the light ray emitted from point
at time
, which reaches the new wavefront at time
. This path is perpendicular to the wavefront it starts from, and has length
, so
yields the eikonal equation.
Note that if
identically and
on the boundary of a region
, then for
outside
, the solution
to the eikonal equation measures the distance from
to
. At least, I think it should
Possibly relevant posts:
- Exactness of differential forms (7/28/2007)
- An integral equation of the second kind (5/23/2007)
- Notes from the underbelly (11/26/2007)
It’s called the eikonal equation because eikonal is something like the greek word for image. The equation comes up all the time in optics and you can even derive it from Maxwell’s equations.
It’s based on the assumption that the frequency of the EM wave is large.
You can solve the equation by the method of first order characteristics. When you do, you find that the characteristic curves are the paths of the light rays, and u itself is the phase of the wave.
Very unfortunately, this otherwise pleasant method breaks down horribly at what are known as “caustics”. These are regions of high intensity, called “caustics” because they can burn you (Caustic is the greek word for burn).
Mathematically, these are envelopes of the characteristic curves. i.e. if there is an envelope for the characteristic curves, then the solution will break down on that envelope. A good example of a caustic is a nephroid. That’s the little spike shaped caustic that forms at the bottom of your coffee mug.
Comment by ObsessiveMathsFreak — 11/20/2006 @ 5:58 am
Thanks for the info. I look forward to, maybe by this time next year, knowing what characteristic curves and envelopes are.
Comment by Alex — 11/21/2006 @ 9:15 am
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for the resolution and contrast of a human eye without any optical aberrations on the cornea or lens and a similar formula after an aberration is introduced in the cornea such as lasix.
Comment by raphael — 7/19/2008 @ 12:01 pm
I don’t
Comment by Alex — 7/20/2008 @ 7:38 pm