Differential of the determinant

Recall the definition of a (Frechet) differential of a mapping between two Banach spaces B and W:

If f : U \subset B \rightarrow V \subset W, and for x \in U there is a linear mapping df_x such that

\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{\|f(x+h)-f(x)-df_x h\|}{\|h\|} = 0,

then f is said to be differentiable at x with differential df_x. If df_x is defined for all x\in U, then f is said to be differentiable with differential df.

Now assume f is differentiable and defined between an n-dimensional Banach space B and \R. Let \{e_i\}_{i=1,\ldots,n} be a basis for B, then

\lim_{h e_i \rightarrow 0} \frac{|f(x+h e_i) - f(x) - h df_x e_i|}{|h|} =0 \Rightarrow df_x e_i = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} ,

so df_x(y) = y \cdot (\nabla f)(x). Likewise you can show that if f : \R^n \rightarrow \R^m, then df_x(y) = \left(\left. \frac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_j}\right|_x \right) y.

Here’s the question: let f : GL(n) \rightarrow \R be defined by f : A \rightarrow \det A. What’s df?

Possibly relevant posts:

Jun 29th, 2007 | Posted in Mathematics
Tags:
  1. Anonymous
    Jul 3rd, 2007 at 05:31 | #1

    Here is what I remember: if you restrict the domain of f to symmetric positive definite matrices, the differential of log(det(X)) at point A is df : X -> tr(inv(A) X)

  2. Jul 3rd, 2007 at 13:06 | #2

    Thanks. It’ll be interesting to see, when I get the result for det, how it simplifies to that special case.

  3. Jul 5th, 2007 at 22:22 | #3

    Bah, I’ve moved on. Here’re some notes on Jacobi’s formula for the derivative of a determinant, with even a Taylor series expansion of the determinant (fancy!)

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped="">
CommentLuv Enabled