Differential of the determinant
Recall the definition of a (Frechet) differential of a mapping between two Banach spaces
and
:
If
, and for
there is a linear mapping
such that
![]()
then
is said to be differentiable at
with differential
. If
is defined for all
, then
is said to be differentiable with differential
.
Now assume
is differentiable and defined between an
-dimensional Banach space
and
. Let
be a basis for
, then
,
so
. Likewise you can show that if
, then 
Here’s the question: let
be defined by
. What’s
?
Possibly relevant posts:
- The implicit and inverse function theorems (9/12/2006)
- Smooth functions (4/14/2005)
- Eikonal equation (11/14/2006)
, and for
there is a linear mapping
such that
with differential
, then
Here is what I remember: if you restrict the domain of f to symmetric positive definite matrices, the differential of log(det(X)) at point A is df : X -> tr(inv(A) X)
Comment by Anonymous — 7/3/2007 @ 5:31 am
Thanks. It’ll be interesting to see, when I get the result for det, how it simplifies to that special case.
Comment by Alex — 7/3/2007 @ 1:06 pm
Bah, I’ve moved on. Here’re some notes on Jacobi’s formula for the derivative of a determinant, with even a Taylor series expansion of the determinant (fancy!)
Comment by Alex — 7/5/2007 @ 10:22 pm