Boundedness of products of certain matrices
October 29th, 2007 ~ Posted in: MathematicsOne of my assignments for this week is to show the stability of the Lax-Friedrichs scheme when applied to the nonlinear 1-d advection equation:
up to a time T, where we can assume smoothness of the solution up to T, and that
, so CFL holds (here
is the time increment over the space increment).
I’ve been attempting to follow the analysis in Strang’s paper; he assumes that the first variation of the difference scheme is stable in his proof, but I must show this is true for this particular scheme. While attempting to show this, I ran into an interesting linear algebra problem– one that I doubt I’ll have solved by Thursday, so I have to find another approach– that leads me to make the following conjecture:
Let
be tridiagonal hollow matrices such that
and all the entries of
lie in
. Then there is a constant
depending only on
, such that for any
,
.
I haven’t a clue how to prove this– the obvious approach with Gerschgorin’s theorem only bounds the norms of each matrix by 2–, but running a couple of lines of Matlab code:
n = 200;
mp = eye(200);
kstop = 2000;
for k=1:kstop
b = rand(n-1,1);
m = diag(b, 1) + diag(b,-1);
mp = mp * m;
norms(k) = norm(mp);
end
plot(norms);
and varying n, kstop gives pretty convincing results. I also found that if you let the entries get even slightly above 1, say up to 1.1, the norms blowup.
Any ideas on how to prove this? My next idea is to look at the minimax theorem.
Update This conjecture can’t be true– just take
to have a spectral radius > 1, then the norms of the products will diverge. So, maybe it’s just true with high probability. Ugh.

This entry was posted on Monday, October 29th, 2007 at 9:40 am and is filed under Mathematics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply