<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Euclidean Distance Matrices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2007/10/euclidean-distance-matrices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2007/10/euclidean-distance-matrices/</link>
	<description>somewhere near the beginning.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: andrew corrigan</title>
		<link>http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2007/10/euclidean-distance-matrices/#comment-219320</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew corrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tangentspace.net/cz/archives/2007/10/euclidean-distance-matrices/#comment-219320</guid>
		<description>Where does the nonsingularity come from? I'm pretty sure that the norm is just conditionally negative definite, so it doesn't come from positive or negative definiteness.

I prefer the Wendland functions, since they lead to sparse and positive definite interpolation matrices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does the nonsingularity come from? I&#8217;m pretty sure that the norm is just conditionally negative definite, so it doesn&#8217;t come from positive or negative definiteness.</p>
<p>I prefer the Wendland functions, since they lead to sparse and positive definite interpolation matrices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
