Quick and easy route to concentration inequalities for order statistics

I’m reading Barvinok’s paper Approximating Orthogonal Matrices by Permutation Matrices. To achieve his goal, he uses some results about the concentration of order statistics. Given n i.i.d. real random variables \xi_i, define the k-th order statistic \omega_k to be the value of the k-smallest \xi_i. So \omega_1 is the smallest of the values, and \omega_n is the largest.

He proves the following lemma:

Suppose that the cumulative distribution function F of \xi_i is continuous and strictly increasing. Let k be an integer, 1 \leq k \leq n.

  1. Let \alpha be a number such that F(\alpha) < k/n < 2F(\alpha). Then

    \displaystyle \mathbb{P}(\omega_k < \alpha) \leq \exp\left(-\frac{n}{3F(\alpha)}\left(\frac{k}{n}-F(\alpha)\right)^2\right).
  2. Let \alpha be a number such that F(\alpha) > k/n. Then

    \displaystyle \mathbb{P}(\omega_k > \alpha) \leq \exp\left(-\frac{n}{2F(\alpha)}\left(\frac{k}{n}-F(\alpha)\right)^2\right).

The result looks complicated, but the proof is quite simple. I’ll explain the first case; the second is analogous. Simply note that if we define \chi_i = \boldsymbol{1}_{\xi_i < \alpha} and \chi = \chi_1 + \cdots + \chi_n, then \omega_k > \alpha iff \chi > k. Then one applies a Chernoff bound: \mathbb{P}(\chi \geq pn(1+\epsilon)) \leq \exp\left(-\frac{\epsilon^2pn}{3}\right) with p = \mathbb{P}(\chi_i = 1) = F(\alpha) and \epsilon = \frac{k}{F(\alpha)n}-1 \in (0,1).

Possibly relevant posts:

Tags: ,
Aug 13th, 2009 | Posted in Mathematics
No comments yet.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped="">
CommentLuv Enabled