Quick and easy route to concentration inequalities for order statistics
I’m reading Barvinok’s paper Approximating Orthogonal Matrices by Permutation Matrices. To achieve his goal, he uses some results about the concentration of order statistics. Given
i.i.d. real random variables
, define the
-th order statistic
to be the value of the
-smallest
. So
is the smallest of the values, and
is the largest.
He proves the following lemma:
Suppose that the cumulative distribution function
of
is continuous and strictly increasing. Let
be an integer,
- Let
be a number such that
Then
- Let
be a number such that
Then
The result looks complicated, but the proof is quite simple. I’ll explain the first case; the second is analogous. Simply note that if we define
and
then
iff
. Then one applies a Chernoff bound:
with
and
.
Possibly relevant posts:
- Comparing products of gaussian moments with one gaussian moment (8/13/2010)
- Notes from the underbelly (11/26/2007)
- Sharpness of Moment bounds, exponential example (7/29/2010)
of 
be a number such that
Then
Then